Monday, 24 October 2011

Alderley Edge Pictures

The Devil's Grave

I should never have taken that picture of the Witches house - 'yon carrion crow' followed me around all day!

Stormy Point

View from Stormy Point

Another view of Stormy Point

The Iron Gates?

Saddlebole

The Druid Stones

A Stone Circle

The Beacon - "none but a fool would bring fire to the mound..."

View from the beacon.



The Wizard's Well
View from Castle Rock (1)

View from Castle Rock (2)

View from Castle Rock (3)

Quaint Gatehouse

Secret Entrance to...

Selina Place has abandoned discretion.

'It was strange to see an inn there...'

'A village inn without a village'


Church quarry




Thieves Hole



The Beacon



Stormy Point
Posted by Picasa

Alderley Edge

View fron Castle Rock
Arrived in Alderley Edge on Sunday afternoon and couldn't resist going straight up to the Edge.  I should have known better:  not even the stunning view above could make up for what Alan Garner described  in 'the Weirdstone of Brisingamen': 
It was not often they visited the Edge.  Sometimes at the weekend they could go there, but then the woods were peopled with townsfolk who, shouting and crashing through the undergrowth, and littering the ground with food wrappings and empty bottles, completely destroyed the atmosphere of the place…Nothing remained.  This place where beauty and terror had been as opposite sides of the same coin, was now a playground of noise.  Its spirit was dead – or hidden.  There was nothing to show that svart or wizard had ever existed.
So crowded, and therefore much of the appeal of the Edge was lost.
At some stage I'll put up the other pictures if  I can ever work out how"helpful" picture sharing software works!

Saturday, 22 October 2011

#I'm Off to See The wizard...#

Well, I'm going to Alderley Edge in the morning, and it's a pretty safe bet I'll spot something wizardy, as most of the town seems to be wizard-branded: the Wizard Inn, Wizards Thatch Luxury Suites, 
the Merlin, or the Wizard Tea Room to mention just a few.
All derived, of course, from  the Legend of Alderley, retold here.  Though what made the story famous to a much wider audience was its use as the inspiration for Alan Garner's classic first novel, The Weirdstone of Brisingamen.  For those who don't know the novel,  a brief summary here:  for those who do there's a lovely, brief interview with Garner talking about his writing and the Edge here.
I first read 'the Weirdstone' and its sequel, 'the Moon of Gomrath' in the mid-sixties when I was eight to ten years old.  The ideal age for those books which are a step up from the Narnia fantasies I had adored but had found the slightly patronising tone beginning to grate.  What I particularly loved about Garner's books was that his magic did not take place in a different world:  his wizards and dwarfs and elves were lurking in shadows just around the corner from where they could step, without warning, into the real world which was also vividly evoked.
And so, forty five years later, I find myself drawn to visit a place I first visited in books.  What could, if it weren't such an insufferably poncey phrase, suitable only to be spoken in a Brian Sewell drawl, as a "literary pilgrimage".  But why not?  As I child I so desperately wanted to see the places Garner described  and now I can.
Strictly above ground this time, though I would love to go to go on one of the organised trips to the mines, some pictures of which can be seen here.

Instead, if the weather holds, I intend to follow this walk  which covers most of the landmarks from Garner's books.  And, sadly, I know I'm too old to run into any wizards.  Indeed, even the big, rambling old barn of a house is more likely today to be occupied by Carlos Tevez than Selina Place.  But the edge itself, with history back to the Bronze age and the sheer physical beauty should be magical enough...

Tuesday, 9 August 2011

When I Were A Lad

Back in the 80s we had proper riots, anti-police riots.  Now after decades of Thatcher, Thatcher-lite Blair and now the coalition of cutters the ideology of the right has won and it's "nick yourself a new pair of trainers" and bugger any sense of solidarity, just take what you want and don't care who gets hurt.



Thursday, 28 July 2011

Rehab, Is It Always Helpful?

A Healthy-Looking Amy Winehouse
The death of Amy Winehouse has produced such a landslide of tosh I hesitate to add anything, but so much of what has been written has been wrong, and in some cases positively dangerous I feel I must contribute.  There have been comments based on her biggest hit along of 'she should have gone to rehab' - rather missing the point that she had in fact just left yet another residential rehab days before her death.
There is the obvious question, does rehab work?  The answer is at best mixed:  as this report in Scientific American shows.  Most drug and alcohol treatment is not evidence-based:  it is faith based.  Once one walks through the looking glass into treatment alternative medicine is the convention. Acupuncture is pushed everywhere even though it just does not work.  Though only as an adjunct to the central treatment, the 12 Step Programme.  A serious contender for the most ridiculous statement on the subject came from Tanya Gold in 'the Guardian':  only the most enlightened doctors will recommend Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous, self-help groups that sometimes get results, although no one knows why.   Well, in a word, no.
Virtually all rehabs fall into one of two groups:  those which call themselves 12 Step based or "Minnesota Method" (which is virtually identical) or those which say they are not but put in the small print "all clients are expected to attend 12 step meetings while resident and after care consists of 12 step meetings".  Ms Gold states that 12 Step programmes "sometimes get results".
They do if you use the alternative medicine tests of having testimonials:  anecdotal evidence.  When things are tested scientifically things are rather different.  A good summary of scientific studies can be found (along with much else of interest) at The Orange Papers.  Within that page the results of Prof George E Valliant are worth particularly close attention as it follows proper scientific practice in having control groups and Prof Valliant is a firm believer in AA.  Yet his study shows AA performing worse than nothing in many ways.  Especially, as we began with Amy Winehouse with the tendency of those who have undergone AA treatment to be more likely to binge afterwards and the higher mortality rate, which Valliant himself admitted was "appalling".
Another look at AA's effectiveness presented amusingly  can be found here:

If you don't want to watch the whole video (though why anyone wouldn't want watch Penn & Teller eludes me) there is a helpful summary at the end:  if you only remember one thing from this programme you just need one figure: 5% - that's the amount of drinkers who quit with AA and it's the number who quit by themselves.  So if you compare a random guy getting drunk in a bar one day with a guy who has been drinking but decides to turn over a new leaf and goes to his first AA meeting that day there's exactly the same chance of either being sober a year later.
That contradicts one of the AA core beliefs, that alcoholism a "progressive, incurable disease" which inevitably ends in prisons, institutions or death but the facts are that many alcohol and drug abusers do stop; indeed most of those who stop do it without outside intervention.
(Penn & Teller Part 2 & Part 3)
There is a widely-held view that alcoholism is a disease.  This did not originate with AA but it is largely because it has been repeated so frequently by AA that it has become so widely accepted.  The philosopher Herbert Fingarette, isolated the treatment paradox: "If the alcoholic’s ailment is a disease that causes an inability to abstain from drinking how can a program insist on voluntary abstention as a condition for treatment?" His book Heavy Drinking, the Myth of Alcoholism as a Disease is essential reading for anyone interested in the subject.
Somehow AA, its siblings, NA, Al-Anon and all the others have managed to establish themselves as the ultimate authority on addiction without their tenets being checked. The image presented is of benevolent self-help groups deliberately down-playing the cultish aspects and purpose of the 12 steps being to induce a religious conversion.  There is a lot more which could be said on this subject, but for now I would recommend browsing the Orange Papers subtitled 'One Man's Analysis of Alcoholics Anonymous and Substance Misuse Recovery Programs, and Real Recovery. An Online Book.'
Instead let's return to poor, talented Amy Winehouse.
A more recent picture.

She was a woman with problems.  In addition to her abuse of alcohol and other drugs she self-harmed, some would say the tattoos were as much self-harm as cutting herself, she had eating disorders, clearly she had great problems with self esteem and how she saw her own body, she was involved in at least one highly destructive relationship.
Some of the things AA teaches include.  "You are powerless over alcohol and drugs, have one glass of wine and you will automatically be back to the worst you've ever been, so there's no point stopping after one glass of wine, you may as well be injecting speedballs, in fact you will because you're powerless."  And "It's not your fault, it's a disease and you're powerless" but later "it's sin which can only be removed by God".  And to get God to forgive you you have to do your Step Four, where you confess all your moral shortcomings and defects of character and resentments, reliving all the shittiest moments of your life.  And everything is your fault.  Something bad happens to you, say you've been raped, you're supposed to look for what you did wrong.
Part of the AA programme is destroying the individual's sense of self worth, because AA   founder Bill Wilson reckoned all alcoholics were the same, full of grandiose inflated opinions of themself.  Bill Wilson may have understood himself, maybe he did need bringing down a peg or two in order to help himself, but I'm not sure the frail girl in the picture above needed it.
I'll end this on a personal note.  A few years ago I was in a detox unit and the scheduled event for 11am was a walk in the park.  On that day I was the only inmate who was physically fit enough to walk any distance and had been in long enough to be trusted not to make a run for it as soon as I got outside, so I ended up having a one to one chat with one of the staff.  She was a psychologist, we were about the same age, had some common experiences and it turned into something more akin to a chat between friends than formal therapy.  So when we were talking freely I asked her about how poor the measurable success rate for treatment was, and was told, honestly but 'off the record': "the problem that everyone involved has to face up to at some time is that nothing:  detox, rehab, treatment, 12 steps, makes any difference at all".

Thursday, 21 July 2011

Hackgate: where are we?

Now we’ve gone a day or two without major resignations and other matters are beginning to appear on the serious papers’ front pages it seems like the time to attempt rough summary of where we stand.
Was there widespread illegal behaviour in tabloid newspapers?
So far only two tabloid employees, Paul McMullan and the late Sean Hoare have said so on the record.  McMullan memorably in the conversation recorded by Hugh Grant and published in the New Statesman on 12th April 2011, said this:
Me Ah . . . I think that was one of the questions asked last week at one of the parliamentary committees. They asked Yates [John Yates, acting deputy commissioner of the Metropolitan Police] if it was true that he thought that the NoW had been hacking the phones of friends and family of those girls who were murdered . . . the Soham murder and the Milly girl [Milly Dowler].
Him Yeah. Yeah. It's more than likely. Yeah . . . It was quite routine. 
Full Text
This was almost three months before the Guardian printed the allegation that Millie Dowler’s phone had been hacked and the affair entered the stratosphere.  Though this was certainly not the first time such allegation had been made, such as this from the legendarily meticulous New York Times on 1st September 2010.
When the New York Times investigated phone-hacking they found a dozen journalists who confirmed this, but only one, Sean Hoare, who was prepared to speak publicly.  Mr Hoare died in the midst of the furore.
While there is a temptation to think that is just too convenient before jumping into conspiracy theories it’s worth recalling that Mr Hoare had said that “my doctor has said that with the state of my liver I ought to be dead,” a few weeks earlier.  A man whose body had been wrecked by substance abuse but was still drinking found himself under intense stress:  in those circumstances death is not really surprising.  It would really help resolve this if one of the reporters who spoke to the New York Times (or anyone else who worked there at the time) were to have the courage to take Hoare’s place by speaking publically.
Perhaps the best lead we have today is the Harbottle & Lewis emails, which News Corp claimed supported their “one rogue reporter” response in 2007 to the jailing of Mulcaire and Goodman.  While Lord MacDonald, former Director of Public Prosecutions has said that he found evidence of serious criminality within three to five minutes of looking at those emails.  Perhaps we shouldn’t be too surprised, after all Neil Innes tweets, Harbottle and Lewis were my lawyers when the Rutles "arrived". I was left with no copyright, no writing credit and no producers royalties.
Another possible obstacle to discovering what exactly happened is the names of the police investigations, Operation Weeting into phone hacking and Operation Elveden into Police corruption set up by former Chief Constable of Norfolk, Andy “Don’t You Dare Call ME Bent” Hayman.  This is why.
And then there’s the Champney’s connection.  Sir Paul Stephenson has, of course, announced his resignation as Metropolitan Police Commissioner, in part because of his £12,000 worth of hospitality there, the ubiquitous Neil Wallis found time to work for them, as well as the News of the World and the Metropolitan Police, and Rebekah Brooks’ husband Charlie has his “kriotherapy” spa there.  But the Parliamentary Home Affairs Select Committee will no doubt sniff out any wrong doing, under the chairmanship of the scrupulously financially correct Dr Keith Vaz, who just happens to be a business partner of the owners of Champney’s
A couple of essential documents if anyone wants to understand the sordid state of the UK popular press in the early part of the last decade is the Operation Motorman report, WhatPrice Privacy, which includes details of how personal details were “blagged” and even a detailed price list and the follow up report, What Price Privacy Now which has a fascinating table of how many times publications employed private detective.  Interestingly the News of the World was way down in fifth place behind the Daily Mail where 58 journalists paid for 952 transactions, with the People, Daily Mirror and Mail on Sunday all above it.
Though if this report of the long-rumoured "Black Ops" room at Fox News checks out Murdoch's British travails may seem trivial.
It's not all Murdoch's fault:  those who buy the tittle-tattle help create the environment in which it flourishes.  An important point from an Aussie competitor.
And finally, if anyone has persevered this long they deserve a laugh:  Jon Stewart's take on the scandal.
PS Breaking as this was being written, did James Murdoch mislead parliament on Taylor payoff?